Court Contracts

Contracts for court filing and case management systems

We requested procurement documents for current and past filing and case management systems from the 5 most populous states.

California

The Judicial Council of California has not yet responded to our request.

Florida

The Florida Office of the State Courts Administrator has not yet acknowledged our request.

New York

The New York State Office of Court Administration has not yet responded to our request.

Texas

The Texas Office of Court Administration (OCA) promptly responded to our request with the following documents:

• 2020 - Present: eFile 2.0
  • Final master services agreement with Tyler Technologies
    • Recommendation to negotiate with Tyler
    • Master services agreement
    • Amendment 1 (2022)
    • Amendment 2 (2022)
  • Offers received
    • Tyler Technologies (winning proposal)
      • Proposal (heavily redacted by the OCA)
      • Cost workbook (withheld by the OCA because of a non-disclosure agreement with Tyler)
      • Proposed edits to master services agreement
    • Icon
      • Proposal
      • Cost workbook
      • Proposed edits to master services agreement
    • JTI
      • Cost proposal
      • Non-cost proposal
  • Request for offers
    • Requirements list
• 2013 - 2020: eFiling agreement with Tyler Technologies
  • Agreement
  • Amendment 1 (2013)
  • Amendment 2 (2013)
  • Amendment 3 (2016)
  • Amendment 4 (2018)
  • Amendment 5 (2019)
  • Amendment 6 (2020)

Pennsylvania

The Pennsylvania Administrative Office of the Courts promptly respond to our request with the following documents:

• 2023 - Present: Drug court case management software
  • Contract with Advanced Computer Technologies
• Other systems: The AOC says that all other filing and case management systems are developed in house, and there is no associated procurement documentation.